Bah! Humbug!

I’ve just seen the British Home Secretary on TV admonishing Muslim parents to detect radicalising influences in their children, and to nip these radicalising influences in the bud, and counteract them, because we share the same values.

Bah humbug!

What is radicalising Muslim youth is the values of Tony Blair’s government — remaining silent in the face of the slaughter of hundreds in Lebanon, and making thousands homeless. It is the Blair government that is in denial if it does not realise this.

Muslim youth in Britain saw this unremitting slaughter on TV screens day after day, and they knew that their government, with its much-vaunted “values”, did less than any other government, except the USA, to try to stop it. Who is the Home Secretary trying to fool? We can all see the “values” that the British government endorses. And it is that that radicalises Muslim youth and others.

I’m not a Muslim, I’m a Christian, and if I lived in Britain I’d be pretty disgusted with the Blair government too, because Christians also live in Lebanon, and they shared the roads, the bridges, the schools and hospitals and homes that were destroyed.

The British Labour Party once stood for values like housing the homeless. Now they stand for making people homeless. It’s up to the British government to change that, not Muslim parents. If the British government wants to avoid the radicalising of Muslim youth, then they’d better stop supporting the injustices that get Muslim youth riled up, or at least appearing to support them. Otherwise their appeal to “common values” will fall on deaf ears. Imagine if a Tory had told the grandparents of the present Labour leaders to watch out for radicalising influences on their children.

Tags: Tony Blair, clash of civilizations, religion and society

Adventus: Irony is not dead

So what has the Bush-Blair invasion of Iraq achieved?

It’s given Al-Qaida a foothold, that’s what.

Adventus: Irony is not dead

I suspect that will be Blair’s lasting legacy when he goes. And Bush’s too, for that matter.

But at least they got rid of Saddam Hussein, so they say.

In Her Own Words

An Anglican priestess becomes Orthodox: Holy Archangels’ Monastery near Prizren, Serbia: In Her Own Words.

Sounds like an interesting person, and I’d like to read more of her words.

Be sceptical. Be very, very sceptical

Well, I was somewhat sceptical about all the police hype of “mass murder on an unimaginable scale”, with the arres of people said to be plotting to blow up passenger aircraft. I don’t find it hard to believe that people might be doing such a thing, but when the police start using journalistic hype, I suspect spin.

But when British foreign policy fundis like Craig Murray warn us to be sceptical, I’m even more on my guard.

I found this in a newgroup, and the guy who posted it wrote:

Mr. Craig Murray is the former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan. He was dismissed from his job after he exposed the fact that there were no actual Islamic terrorists in Uzbekistan. His investigations showed that the alleged terrorists were merely innocent local Muslim people who were being systematically tortured into signing false confessions. These confessions were then gleefully received by the US and the UK despite the fact they knew them to be false. For these and other favours from the Uzbek dictatorship
the US paid a lot of money and supported this tyrannical regime.

Cyprianic vs Augustinian understandings of holy orders outside the church

In A conservative blog for peace Young Fogey gives one of the best summaries of the differences between Orthodox and Roman Catholic ecclesiology I have seen, at least on the question of “validity of orders”.

This is linked to Ad Orientem: Once a Priest , Always a Priest?, which points to a discussion on the question.

Sanity at last!

On Thursday I was sitting working and the TV was tuned to Sky News, with the sound turned down, and occasionally I turned up the sound to hear if there was anything new. There wasn’t.

The whole broadcast, the whole day long, was about an alleged plot to blow up aeroplanes flying between Britain and the US, and the chaos at airports caused by the stricter security measures.

My son came in and glanced at it occasionally, and then remarked that it looked like a film called V for vendetta, which he said was an old one that predicted the kind of place Britain seemed to be becoming. To me it seemed like one of the “Hate weeks” out of George Orwell’s 1984. Every now and then they would switch to American commentators who would go on about the “evil people out there who spend all their time planning to destroy us”. And the message was clear: Sky News wanted their viewers to spend all day thinking about the evil people who spend all day thinking how to destroy us. So this is the New World Order. This is the post-Cold War world.

I am reminded of the Cold War hymn:

The day God gave thee, Man, is ending
the darkness falls at thy behest
who spent thy little life defending
from conquest by the East, the West

The sun that bids us live is waking
behind the cloud that bids us die
and in the murk fresh minds are making
new plans to blow us all sky high.

And into all this paranoia comes a voice of sanity from, of all places, the Financial Times.

The first response must be to adopt a foreign policy that saps terrorists of support without pandering to their demands. It should not be necessary to remind either the US or the British government that it is not possible simply to kill or catch all the terrorists until there are none left – a pointless strategy based on what one might call the “lump of terror” fallacy.

The second response must be a sense of proportion. More than 3,000 people died last year on our roads, but the roads stay open. Even the worst acts of terrorism reap their largest toll in hysterical responses. Scotland Yard’s statement that they had disrupted a plot to cause “mass murder on an unimaginable scale” was alarmist even if it is true. Journalists – and terrorists – are perfectly capable of spreading hyperbole without any help from the police. The most powerful answer to terrorism is not to be terrified.

Not that it’s nice that some people were allegedly plotting to blow up aeroplanes. It’s a good thing that the British police are taking such potential threats seriously and trying to neutralise them, though preferably not by comitting mayhem on the Underground and murdering Brazilian electricians.

But it’s the media hype that is even more disturbing than the alleged plot. When a police spokesman talks about “mass murder on an unimaginable scale”, he’s dead wrong. It is quite imaginable. We’ve seen it on TV in the Near East for the last 6 weeks. And during that time it hasn’t stopped in the Middle East either. Thirty-five people actually died in a car bomb explosion in Iraq on Thursday, in case anyone noticed. Not Sky News, though.

It looks as though Big Brother in the UK was thinking that the public was getting too sympathetic towards the wogs who were dying in places like Lebanon, and needed to be brought back on side.

Technorati tags: civilian deaths, disinformation, politics, news media

Sanity at last!

On Thursday I was sitting working and the TV was tuned to Sky News, with the sound turned down, and occasionally I turned up the sound to hear if there was anything new. There wasn’t.

The whole broadcast, the whole day long, was about an alleged plot to blow up aeroplanes flying between Britain and the US, and the chaos at airports caused by the stricter security measures.

My son came in and glanced at it occasionally, and then remarked that it looked like a film called V for vendetta, which he said was an old one that predicted the kind of place Britain seemed to be becoming. To me it seemed like one of the “Hate weeks” out of George Orwell’s 1984. Every now and then they would switch to American commentators who would go on about the “evil people out there who spend all their time planning to destroy us”. And the message was clear: Sky News wanted their viewers to spend all day thinking about the evil people who spend all day thinking how to destroy us. So this is the New World Order. This is the post-Cold War world.

I am reminded of the Cold War hymn:

The day God gave thee, Man, is ending
the darkness falls at thy behest
who spent thy little life defending
from conquest by the East, the West

The sun that bids us live is waking
behind the cloud that bids us die
and in the murk fresh minds are making
new plans to blow us all sky high.

And into all this paranoia comes a voice of sanity from, of all places, the Financial Times.

The first response must be to adopt a foreign policy that saps terrorists of support without pandering to their demands. It should not be necessary to remind either the US or the British government that it is not possible simply to kill or catch all the terrorists until there are none left – a pointless strategy based on what one might call the “lump of terror” fallacy.

The second response must be a sense of proportion. More than 3,000 people died last year on our roads, but the roads stay open. Even the worst acts of terrorism reap their largest toll in hysterical responses. Scotland Yard’s statement that they had disrupted a plot to cause “mass murder on an unimaginable scale” was alarmist even if it is true. Journalists – and terrorists – are perfectly capable of spreading hyperbole without any help from the police. The most powerful answer to terrorism is not to be terrified.

Not that it’s nice that some people were allegedly plotting to blow up aeroplanes. It’s a good thing that the British police are taking such potential threats seriously and trying to neutralise them, though preferably not by comitting mayhem on the Underground and murdering Brazilian electricians.

But it’s the media hype that is even more disturbing than the alleged plot. When a police spokesman talks about “mass murder on an unimaginable scale”, he’s dead wrong. It is quite imaginable. We’ve seen it on TV in the Near East for the last 6 weeks. And during that time it hasn’t stopped in the Middle East either. Thirty-five people actually died in a car bomb explosion in Iraq on Thursday, in case anyone noticed. Not Sky News, though.

It looks as though Big Brother in the UK was thinking that the public was getting too sympathetic towards the wogs who were dying in places like Lebanon, and needed to be brought back on side.

Technorati tags: civilian deaths, disinformation, politics, news media

Christian rune stones and Christian/pagan relations

Matt Stone writes about Christian rune stones in Scandinavia, and the implication that Christians and pagans coexisted quite happily.

I have written elsewhere about the hostility between Christians and pagans that has developed in the West over the last 30 years or so, so that people find it difficult to understand some things written not much longer ago than that, such as some of the references to pagan deities and demigods in C.S. Lewis’s Narnia stories. How much more difficult, then, to understand things written a thousand years earlier.

Technotari tags: Inklings, Christianity & paganism, runes

This is bizarre!

“If you have the temerity to get in the way of one of our bombs, please have the decency to be our enemy. Thank you. Have a nice day.”

Who’s calling?

The Israeli Defence Force, that’s who.

Morality and obscenity

The obscene score-card for death in this latest war now stands as follows: 508 Lebanese civilians, 46 Hizbollah guerrillas, 26 Lebanese soldiers, 36 Israeli soldiers and 19 Israeli civilians.

In other words, Hizbollah is killing more Israeli soldiers than civilians and the Israelis are killing far more Lebanese civilians than they are guerrillas. The Lebanese Red Cross has found 40 more civilian dead in the south of the country in the past two days, many of them with wounds suggesting they might have survived had medical help been available.

from The Independent, 3 August 2006

And from an Israeli point of view (a minority view)

This war is not a just war. Israel is using excessive force without distinguishing between civilian population and enemy, whose sole purpose is extortion. That is not to say that morality and justice are on Hezbollah’s side. Most certainly not. But the fact that Hezbollah “started it” when it kidnapped soldiers from across an international border does not even begin to tilt the scales of justice toward our side.

‘Nuff said.

Technorati tags: innocent civilians, Lebanon war, morality, just war, Israel